kv0925: (Default)
[personal profile] kv0925
Okay, I honestly wasn't going to post anything political today, but then I saw this article about Sarah Palin's interview on ABC last night, and this bit in particular:

Interestingly, McCain campaign manager Rick Davis earlier told radio host Hugh Hewitt that the media's coverage of Palin amounts to an "attack on Christianity" itself.

Um, whut? Is this serious? Criticizing McCain's VP choice because it was clearly a political selection rather than a logical one; because she has the wrong ethos and temperament to be mayor of a town of 5,000, let alone Vice President (or, all-too-conceivably, President) of the nation; because she doesn't just disrespect the separation of Church and State, she'd like to trample it into the ground.. calling her out on any of that means one is either sexist or attacking Christianity?

The point Davis was really trying to make is that religion, as a personal thing, should not be made an issue when looking at the candidates, but the media is making it one and is doing so in a way that often derides the faith of some of these people. That's fair enough in theory. But you know what? It isn't the media's fault if the candidates themselves are the ones bringing their religion into the public arena, like in the furor over abortion, like in the desire to legislate abstinence-only sex education, like in the move to mandate the teaching of creationism and other pseudo-science in public schools, like when a candidate for national office speaks before an audience and says that our soldiers are in Iraq "on a task from God."

Don't worry, one of these days I'll get the memo and stop longing for things to Just Make Sense.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-09-13 12:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cp.livejournal.com
There may well be sexism in the media portrayals of Palin, and even in many voters' opinions of her, for both better and worse. But I assure you my own condemnation of her regards her gender as irrelevant, except for the fact that it's affecting how she's perceived among her own gender. I don't like her because her stances on most issues is anathema to me, as are her practices while in office thus far. As I said, I have no reason whatsoever to suspect that she'll be a better Vice President or President than she has proven to be as a mayor or governor (the extent of her office's powers, by the way, has little to do with how poorly she has executed that office), and I believe her selection was purely political rather than justified by her experience or abilities.

Date: 2008-09-13 12:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cp.livejournal.com
btw, the slant on that blog is of head-spinning magnitude. You may want to think twice about citing it as a legitimate source for future argument.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-09-13 02:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cp.livejournal.com
Exactly.. I do judge for myself, and I personally find her conclusions unfounded.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-09-13 05:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cp.livejournal.com
More or less, yes. People are people, and some are more worthwhile than others regardless of their gender, color, or creed. I was, after all, born and raised in Florida, where the morons run thick in every color of the rainbow. :)
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-09-14 11:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cp.livejournal.com
So.. you don't think anyone is a moron? Or you just think that lots of people are morons, but they're all God's morons?
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-09-14 04:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cp.livejournal.com
Ah, see, there again we're running into trouble because I'm using the actual dictionary definition of the word.

1. a person who is notably stupid or lacking in good judgment.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-09-15 12:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cp.livejournal.com
But both are relevant.

You meant Forrest, for example.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-09-15 02:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cp.livejournal.com
lol, I also really enjoyed when you typo'ed "right" where you meant "write" in a recent post. :)
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-09-15 02:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cp.livejournal.com
Sorry, I got bored with our debate so I had to start attacking your linguistic skills. I do apologize.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2008-09-15 03:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cp.livejournal.com
Well yeah, though I don't remember seeing any of those on you...

Date: 2008-09-16 03:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cinnamonbite.livejournal.com
YOU owe me a new keyboard!
BAH HAHAhahahahahaha

Date: 2008-09-16 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cp.livejournal.com
Yeah, I liked that one, if I do say so myself. ;) likeinabook is an old acquaintance of mine, we've been going back and forth on religious and political issues for years. Not too often these days, though--we realized it was unhealthy, so we scaled back our debates to maybe once a year or so. :)

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Profile

kv0925: (Default)
kv0925

May 2017

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 11:20 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios